Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Mark Hamill on the Muppet Show circa 1980.
REMEMBER ALDERAAAAANNNNNN!
part two
part three
viewing this for the first time since childhood has confirmed something for me:
Family programming really WAS better when we were kids*. It's not just the nostaglia rose-colored glasses on this one. Then again, there was an infinitely higher demand for programming for the entire family before the internet.
If you're old enough to remember before the internet became a household thing, I want you to meditate on that for a second. Think about that first dial-up modem and the screeching sounds it made when you connected. If you were the first cool kid on the block with a computer, remember having a limited number of minutes each month that you could be on line, like cell phone minutes.
Now try and picture how you're going to explain to your kids someday that you're older than the internet.
*(I use the term 'we' in the vaguest sense, as none of us at YourGeekWorld.com were born yet when The Muppet Show was canceled in 1981, though it was still on the air throughout most of our childhoods.)
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Friday, July 23, 2010
the ultimate team-up, coming soon!
oh, that's right.
Dr. McNinja and Axe Cop. Together for six pages!
read the full story on Comics Alliance.
Dr. McNinja and Axe Cop. Together for six pages!
read the full story on Comics Alliance.
Monday, July 12, 2010
and the award for 'weirdest shit on the internet' goes to...
I've spent the last two years with the same nagging question in the back of my head every time I peruse the internet. Is there anything out there that makes less sense than jedichefs.com?
After many exhausting hours of research, I've resigned myself to the fact that, as far as pages written in English (excluding fetish porn), there really isn't.
So, what's their deal?
I honestly have no idea. I've been poking around the website for over an hour, and I'm still not sure. I do, however, know that they raise money for Cancer Research UK, So I suppose that even nonsense has its merits.
I think the part of Jedi Chefs that's most confusing is the Celebrity Jedi Chef page, which is an alphabetized list of image galleries featuring pictures of celebrities, primarily from sci-fi shows, donning the website's signature floppy chef hats and wielding lightsabers. For the most part, the celebs look just as confused as we are, though some of them seem to have excellent sense of humor about the whole ordeal.
Alan Tudyk, for example, is looking a little scared. His former 'Firefly' co-star Sean Maher, however, seems to be taking it in stride.
The number of celebrities they've managed to get to take these ridiculous pictures is staggering. A considerable amount of the casts of Buffy, Firefly, Battlestar Galactica, Heroes, Stargate SG-1,various Star Treks, the new and old Star Wars trilogies, and folks from all over Doctor Who fill the list, making me wonder if perhaps the YGW Away Team needs a silly gimmick to get us some celebrity endorsements. I'm pretty sure there isn't anything the guys wouldn't be willing to do if it meant a picture of them with, say for example, Felicia Day.
I don't know what confuses me more: what's going on, or why so many geek celebs are in on it!
Sunday, July 4, 2010
2010 Movie Roundup: what we loved, what we hated, and what we can't wait to see
So, at the start of the year, 2010 looked like it was going to be a pretty good year for cinema, especially if you're a nerd. Sure, we aren't getting another Star Trek until 2012, but we had some great stuff to hold us over in the meantime. We had intentions of doing in-depth reviews of all of these films when we saw them, but quite frankly, Tyler and Phil just didn't have enough to say about most of them, and you probably don't want to read the six and seven paragraph tirades that my overpriced film education would have wrought upon you had I been left to write alone. So, here we go.
HOLY SHIT. HOLY SHIT. THIS FUCKING MOVIE. This is one that even when we'd agreed to do a single roundup blog about the movies, we were still going to give it's own entry, but all we had written was HOLY SHIT AWESOME over and over again. We went in trying not to expect too much, even though the first one is arguably the best comic-to-film adaptation since the first Spider Man (and we all know what a disappointment THAT franchise turned int0). But I think we all know that, unless a stoned monkey wrote the script, it was going to be entertaining at the very least. And I would watch Robert Downey Jr. watch paint dry. So, at the very least, I would walk out happy.
Well, RDJ was just as phenomenal as he was in the first movie, and the dynamic with Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Pots was just as snappy and thick with sexual tension as it was in the first film. Add in a somewhat bland but tolerable turn by Scarlett Johansson (is anyone surprised? Really?) as the seductive SHIELD agent Black Widow and a great job from Don Cheadle (which, I mean, is anyone surprised by this?) as Lt. Rhodes a.k.a. WAR MACHINE (OH MY GOD YES). Also, Mickey Rourke being.... well, Mickey Rourke. Sure, he was ridiculously camp, but that's just WHAT HE DOES. For him, this was surprisingly subtle (though not by any other standard).
OVERALL: sure, I could go on for a few more paragraphs about the ill-fitting costumes (what was up with Scarlett Johansson's boobs being completely squashed into unnatural positions in half her outfits? Nothing hot about pancake tits!) or the lack of continuity with whatever the hell was wrong with Mickey Rourke's fingernails (half-inch thick gray acrylics in one scene, perfectly normal, clean nails in the next. Good job, makeup department!) or even about the complete disregard for physics in some of the effects, but honestly? It's a COMIC BOOK ADAPTATION. And it's a sequel. And I didn't want to gouge my eyes out. On the contrary, I enjoyed it so much that some of the glaring mistakes didn't even strike me until the second or third viewing. This is a new milestone for cinema as we know it.
A word of background on this one: Tyler and I are huge fans of the original film. His dad made him watch it a hundred times as a kid, and the only movie my grandma and I might have watched more times than this classic was possibly Wrath of Khan. So it comes as no surprise that we were immeasurably excited to see it remade with better effects and LIAM FUCKING NEESON and RALPH FIENNES together for the first time since Schindler's List.
However, we also were very much aware that there was really no need for a remake, and the currently overwhelming theme of 'rebooting' older films with fresh casts, better effects, and infinitely worse scripts quelled our excitement into more of a cautious optimism.
And it's a good thing we didn't get our hopes up, because the whole film was pretty...underwhelming. Nothing new was really brought to the table, except for the whole mess with Io, which was kind of convoluted (in the original myth, Io gets turned into a cow, not given eternal youth. The change in the myth makes no sense and is obviously done only to serve the plot) and the original got by fine without her, so why bother? At least the performance from Gemma Arterton is infinitely better than in the other film we recently saw her in: Prince of Persia. If nothing else good came of this, at least we now have the line "UNLEASH THE KRAKEN!," which we have added to our repertoire of unnecessarily enthusiastic exclamations to yell at eachother in completely inappropriate situation, along with Eric Bana's "FIRE EVERYTHING!" from last summer's Star Trek reboot. Yes, we are children.
OVERALL: not bad, but not exactly groundbreaking. The new effects were certainly a nice update in some places, but going all J.J. Abrams on everything the gods ever touched was sort of annoying, and may have given us retinal damage.
Okay, so I really don't care about Martin Scorsese anymore. Which isn't to say that I don't appreciate his impact on film, but I just don't care for most of his stuff. Perhaps it's a generational thing, or just personal taste. I don't know. The Departed was the first one of his films that I genuinely enjoyed since Cape Fear. But to each his own, I suppose. Either way, I wasn't expecting much from this one, even though my mother has been hounding me to read the book for a few years now because she knew I would love it.
Well, mom was right. At least, I loved the movie, so I can only imagine that the book is even better. But we're here to talk about the film.
I wouldn't really describe most of the film as being subtle, but the subtleties in it are what really make it. Slight, inexplicable changes in color palette and tight editing tweaks really give a sense of discomfort and disorientation, and that's where the movie thrives. At several points in the film, Tyler and I had to ask eachother if there was something wrong with the film, or if our eyes were playing tricks on us, only to realize later that it had been deliberate on the part of the filmmakers. If that isn't incredibly effective filmmaking, I don't know what is.
The acting in this was pretty top notch as well, but not unexpected. Leonardo DiCaprio seems to have really come into his own in the last few years, and is completely convincing and watchable even in the most unwatchable movies (that means you, Revolutionary Road). Ben Kingsley is also, as always, amazing. And keep an eye out for a cameo from Jackie Earle Haley.
We don't want to say much about the film because we don't want to give anything away, and the story, though a bit predictable in places, does keep you on your toes to the very end.
OVERALL: Worth seeing for the atmosphere alone, but probably just one time, as most of what makes it great really won't have the same impact on a second viewing.
Tyler, Phil and I all went to see this one together opening weekend because we were just so goddamn excited (by which I mean that I was excited and they were vaguely interested, so I dragged them along). All three of us were huge fans of the game it was supposedly based off of, and the boys both really enjoyed the rest of the trilogy, though I lost interest about two hours into the second game and never finished it.
For those who haven't seen it, the movie is relatively faithful to the original for the first twenty or so minutes, until the shit hits the fan. The Prince is still the adopted son of the King who is invading Azad (changed to Alamut in the film), even if he has other biological sons in this version who play pretty big roles (in fact, the eldest brother's role feels more like the King from the game than the King from the film does). The antagonist role, played brilliantly in the film by Ben Kingsley, has changed from the turncoat Vizier of Azad to the king's jealous brother. The role, however, remains very similar in spirit. However, once the characters are established, everything goes completely off course.
My biggest qualm with the film is that the sands are never really released. No sand monsters, just weird middle eastern faux-ninjas and lots of running away. The action is still entirely enjoyable when you can find it, but the majority of the film is talking, running away, and wide shots of the scenery, making it feel more like Lord of the Rings in Persia than like the game. The dialogue isn't bad and the pacing stays pretty solid, but the whole story is kind of convoluted and confusing if you go into it having played the game and expecting, at the very least, to see the same idea. Also, without giving away too much, the ending makes a genuine attempt to remain faithful to the game, which, given the changes made to most of the story, makes it feel a little silly and, well, completely jump the shark.
As far as the acting, Jake Gyllenhal impressed us. We really weren't expecting much from him at all, and we were pleasantly surprised to see him pull it off. (And if you had qualms with his or anyone else's pseudo-British accents, we kindly ask you to play the game again. It's one of the few things they kept authentic and consistent throughout the movie, so I'm not hardly going to take points off for it) Ben Kingsley was excellent as always, and most of the supporting cast of character actors did their parts well.
The only thing we disagreed about on this one was Gemma Arterton. We agreed that the dialogue for Farah (renamed Tamina for the film) was very faithful to the spirit of the game, and that Arterton's delivery was disappointing, sounding like she was reading and downright bored for most of the movie, except which she was screaming unconvincingly. Where we disagree is that I don't think she looked the part at all, and Tyler didn't take as much issue with it. When she is initially introduced, it is said outright by the the titular prince's brother that she is supposed to be the most beautiful woman in all the land. Now, she's a pretty girl, but not when she's been makeup-coated into the unnatural abomination she was transformed into for this role. The girl is naturally either ginger or a very light brunette, and has a freckled, pale complexion that belongs on a Irish Spring commercial. She also has a very unique face shape which, though usually pretty, looks awkward and mannish with the haircut she was given for the film (which makes no sense to me, as not only is it unflattering, but it isn't the character's normal hair anyway). If she had knocked it out of the park with her acting I probably wouldn't have noticed or cared, but when someone is cast as a lead in a high budget film and can't act, it makes me wonder why they were cast in the role at all.
OVERALL: a fun, family friendly action movie. If you need an excuse to retreat into an air conditioned theater for a few hours to escape the heat, not the worst decision you could make.
You know what? you might as well just take a peek at our blog from a while back about just how excited we are to see this movie. Nothing has changed, aside from a new trailer. We're still disgustingly excited.
Oh, hi there, Jerry Bruckheimer. What was that? You're going to ride the coattails of the sucess of the Harry Potter franchise by making a knockoff starring Nicholas Cage?
As much as I HATED the very idea of this one from the very beginning, it's growing on me. Mostly because it looks fun. And while the Potter films are becoming increasingly dark and are still interesting, they aren't really the most fun you can have with the genre. And over the years, my hatred for Nicholas Cage has reached the singularity and is starting to turn into some sort of twisted love.
Hey, remember how we talked about how much we're starting to love Leonardo DiCaprio? Well, this looks phenomenal. And I mean, look at the rest of the cast: Michael Caine, Ken Watanabe, Cillian Murphy, Ellen Page, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Lukas Haas. And of course, it's written and directed by CHRISTOPHER FUCKING NOLAN. This sounds like the perfect storm of psychological thrillers.
WHAT WE'VE WATCHED THUS FAR
HOLY SHIT. HOLY SHIT. THIS FUCKING MOVIE. This is one that even when we'd agreed to do a single roundup blog about the movies, we were still going to give it's own entry, but all we had written was HOLY SHIT AWESOME over and over again. We went in trying not to expect too much, even though the first one is arguably the best comic-to-film adaptation since the first Spider Man (and we all know what a disappointment THAT franchise turned int0). But I think we all know that, unless a stoned monkey wrote the script, it was going to be entertaining at the very least. And I would watch Robert Downey Jr. watch paint dry. So, at the very least, I would walk out happy.
Well, RDJ was just as phenomenal as he was in the first movie, and the dynamic with Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Pots was just as snappy and thick with sexual tension as it was in the first film. Add in a somewhat bland but tolerable turn by Scarlett Johansson (is anyone surprised? Really?) as the seductive SHIELD agent Black Widow and a great job from Don Cheadle (which, I mean, is anyone surprised by this?) as Lt. Rhodes a.k.a. WAR MACHINE (OH MY GOD YES). Also, Mickey Rourke being.... well, Mickey Rourke. Sure, he was ridiculously camp, but that's just WHAT HE DOES. For him, this was surprisingly subtle (though not by any other standard).
OVERALL: sure, I could go on for a few more paragraphs about the ill-fitting costumes (what was up with Scarlett Johansson's boobs being completely squashed into unnatural positions in half her outfits? Nothing hot about pancake tits!) or the lack of continuity with whatever the hell was wrong with Mickey Rourke's fingernails (half-inch thick gray acrylics in one scene, perfectly normal, clean nails in the next. Good job, makeup department!) or even about the complete disregard for physics in some of the effects, but honestly? It's a COMIC BOOK ADAPTATION. And it's a sequel. And I didn't want to gouge my eyes out. On the contrary, I enjoyed it so much that some of the glaring mistakes didn't even strike me until the second or third viewing. This is a new milestone for cinema as we know it.
A word of background on this one: Tyler and I are huge fans of the original film. His dad made him watch it a hundred times as a kid, and the only movie my grandma and I might have watched more times than this classic was possibly Wrath of Khan. So it comes as no surprise that we were immeasurably excited to see it remade with better effects and LIAM FUCKING NEESON and RALPH FIENNES together for the first time since Schindler's List.
However, we also were very much aware that there was really no need for a remake, and the currently overwhelming theme of 'rebooting' older films with fresh casts, better effects, and infinitely worse scripts quelled our excitement into more of a cautious optimism.
And it's a good thing we didn't get our hopes up, because the whole film was pretty...underwhelming. Nothing new was really brought to the table, except for the whole mess with Io, which was kind of convoluted (in the original myth, Io gets turned into a cow, not given eternal youth. The change in the myth makes no sense and is obviously done only to serve the plot) and the original got by fine without her, so why bother? At least the performance from Gemma Arterton is infinitely better than in the other film we recently saw her in: Prince of Persia. If nothing else good came of this, at least we now have the line "UNLEASH THE KRAKEN!," which we have added to our repertoire of unnecessarily enthusiastic exclamations to yell at eachother in completely inappropriate situation, along with Eric Bana's "FIRE EVERYTHING!" from last summer's Star Trek reboot. Yes, we are children.
OVERALL: not bad, but not exactly groundbreaking. The new effects were certainly a nice update in some places, but going all J.J. Abrams on everything the gods ever touched was sort of annoying, and may have given us retinal damage.
Okay, so I really don't care about Martin Scorsese anymore. Which isn't to say that I don't appreciate his impact on film, but I just don't care for most of his stuff. Perhaps it's a generational thing, or just personal taste. I don't know. The Departed was the first one of his films that I genuinely enjoyed since Cape Fear. But to each his own, I suppose. Either way, I wasn't expecting much from this one, even though my mother has been hounding me to read the book for a few years now because she knew I would love it.
Well, mom was right. At least, I loved the movie, so I can only imagine that the book is even better. But we're here to talk about the film.
I wouldn't really describe most of the film as being subtle, but the subtleties in it are what really make it. Slight, inexplicable changes in color palette and tight editing tweaks really give a sense of discomfort and disorientation, and that's where the movie thrives. At several points in the film, Tyler and I had to ask eachother if there was something wrong with the film, or if our eyes were playing tricks on us, only to realize later that it had been deliberate on the part of the filmmakers. If that isn't incredibly effective filmmaking, I don't know what is.
The acting in this was pretty top notch as well, but not unexpected. Leonardo DiCaprio seems to have really come into his own in the last few years, and is completely convincing and watchable even in the most unwatchable movies (that means you, Revolutionary Road). Ben Kingsley is also, as always, amazing. And keep an eye out for a cameo from Jackie Earle Haley.
We don't want to say much about the film because we don't want to give anything away, and the story, though a bit predictable in places, does keep you on your toes to the very end.
OVERALL: Worth seeing for the atmosphere alone, but probably just one time, as most of what makes it great really won't have the same impact on a second viewing.
YGW RATING:9/10
So, for some unfortunate reason, I am the only one here who has seen Kick-Ass. How this happened, I will never know.
For that reason, I'm going to refrain from doing an extensive review until everyone else has seen it. I will, however, admit to absolutely loving it. I haven't read the graphic novel, though, so perhaps I'll try to get that done by the time the boys see the film so we can have a proper critique.
For that reason, I'm going to refrain from doing an extensive review until everyone else has seen it. I will, however, admit to absolutely loving it. I haven't read the graphic novel, though, so perhaps I'll try to get that done by the time the boys see the film so we can have a proper critique.
Tyler, Phil and I all went to see this one together opening weekend because we were just so goddamn excited (by which I mean that I was excited and they were vaguely interested, so I dragged them along). All three of us were huge fans of the game it was supposedly based off of, and the boys both really enjoyed the rest of the trilogy, though I lost interest about two hours into the second game and never finished it.
For those who haven't seen it, the movie is relatively faithful to the original for the first twenty or so minutes, until the shit hits the fan. The Prince is still the adopted son of the King who is invading Azad (changed to Alamut in the film), even if he has other biological sons in this version who play pretty big roles (in fact, the eldest brother's role feels more like the King from the game than the King from the film does). The antagonist role, played brilliantly in the film by Ben Kingsley, has changed from the turncoat Vizier of Azad to the king's jealous brother. The role, however, remains very similar in spirit. However, once the characters are established, everything goes completely off course.
My biggest qualm with the film is that the sands are never really released. No sand monsters, just weird middle eastern faux-ninjas and lots of running away. The action is still entirely enjoyable when you can find it, but the majority of the film is talking, running away, and wide shots of the scenery, making it feel more like Lord of the Rings in Persia than like the game. The dialogue isn't bad and the pacing stays pretty solid, but the whole story is kind of convoluted and confusing if you go into it having played the game and expecting, at the very least, to see the same idea. Also, without giving away too much, the ending makes a genuine attempt to remain faithful to the game, which, given the changes made to most of the story, makes it feel a little silly and, well, completely jump the shark.
As far as the acting, Jake Gyllenhal impressed us. We really weren't expecting much from him at all, and we were pleasantly surprised to see him pull it off. (And if you had qualms with his or anyone else's pseudo-British accents, we kindly ask you to play the game again. It's one of the few things they kept authentic and consistent throughout the movie, so I'm not hardly going to take points off for it) Ben Kingsley was excellent as always, and most of the supporting cast of character actors did their parts well.
The only thing we disagreed about on this one was Gemma Arterton. We agreed that the dialogue for Farah (renamed Tamina for the film) was very faithful to the spirit of the game, and that Arterton's delivery was disappointing, sounding like she was reading and downright bored for most of the movie, except which she was screaming unconvincingly. Where we disagree is that I don't think she looked the part at all, and Tyler didn't take as much issue with it. When she is initially introduced, it is said outright by the the titular prince's brother that she is supposed to be the most beautiful woman in all the land. Now, she's a pretty girl, but not when she's been makeup-coated into the unnatural abomination she was transformed into for this role. The girl is naturally either ginger or a very light brunette, and has a freckled, pale complexion that belongs on a Irish Spring commercial. She also has a very unique face shape which, though usually pretty, looks awkward and mannish with the haircut she was given for the film (which makes no sense to me, as not only is it unflattering, but it isn't the character's normal hair anyway). If she had knocked it out of the park with her acting I probably wouldn't have noticed or cared, but when someone is cast as a lead in a high budget film and can't act, it makes me wonder why they were cast in the role at all.
OVERALL: a fun, family friendly action movie. If you need an excuse to retreat into an air conditioned theater for a few hours to escape the heat, not the worst decision you could make.
LOOKING AHEAD: WHAT WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT
SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD
I think it might be physically impossible for this movie to be more perfect for us. It's based on a graphic novel series of the same name and just as chock-full of video game references. I mean, Shigeru Miyamoto got to see a rough cut screening of the film and liked it enough to give the filmmakers his blessing to use music from Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Come ON. This movie looks so good that I'm starting to get suspicious.
SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD
I think it might be physically impossible for this movie to be more perfect for us. It's based on a graphic novel series of the same name and just as chock-full of video game references. I mean, Shigeru Miyamoto got to see a rough cut screening of the film and liked it enough to give the filmmakers his blessing to use music from Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Come ON. This movie looks so good that I'm starting to get suspicious.
THE LAST AIRBENDER
You know what? you might as well just take a peek at our blog from a while back about just how excited we are to see this movie. Nothing has changed, aside from a new trailer. We're still disgustingly excited.
THE SORCERER'S APPRENTICE
Oh, hi there, Jerry Bruckheimer. What was that? You're going to ride the coattails of the sucess of the Harry Potter franchise by making a knockoff starring Nicholas Cage?
As much as I HATED the very idea of this one from the very beginning, it's growing on me. Mostly because it looks fun. And while the Potter films are becoming increasingly dark and are still interesting, they aren't really the most fun you can have with the genre. And over the years, my hatred for Nicholas Cage has reached the singularity and is starting to turn into some sort of twisted love.
INCEPTION
Hey, remember how we talked about how much we're starting to love Leonardo DiCaprio? Well, this looks phenomenal. And I mean, look at the rest of the cast: Michael Caine, Ken Watanabe, Cillian Murphy, Ellen Page, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Lukas Haas. And of course, it's written and directed by CHRISTOPHER FUCKING NOLAN. This sounds like the perfect storm of psychological thrillers.
Friday, July 2, 2010
YGW on Guilded Age!
So, the awesome Phil Kahn of Guilded Age (not our dear monotone friend from the YGW Podcast) asked me a few weeks back if I wanted to do a guest strip for his amazing comic, and I was more than happy to oblige. Unfortunately, it turned into a week and a half of me staring at photoshop and praying for a punchline to descend from the heavens, and the night before I promised to have it for him, I slapped something together and made a bad World of Warcraft joke. Ah, well!
In Phil's newspost accompanying the guest strip, he mentions YourGeekWorld (specifically this blog) and also OtakuBooty.Com, where we met. Contrary to the name, the site is really more of a subscription social networking site for all sorts of nerds, not just the animu folks, and not really a dating site per se (though I know some pretty cool folks who have ended up in relationships or even getting married to people they met through the site). Their forums are probably my favorite haunt on the web, and worth a look if you're ever bored, though you can only access one tab without a paid membership.
the comic of the day has a permanent home here.
Phil just informed me that the comic was also featured in the weekly comic roundup on WoW.com
In Phil's newspost accompanying the guest strip, he mentions YourGeekWorld (specifically this blog) and also OtakuBooty.Com, where we met. Contrary to the name, the site is really more of a subscription social networking site for all sorts of nerds, not just the animu folks, and not really a dating site per se (though I know some pretty cool folks who have ended up in relationships or even getting married to people they met through the site). Their forums are probably my favorite haunt on the web, and worth a look if you're ever bored, though you can only access one tab without a paid membership.
the comic of the day has a permanent home here.
Phil just informed me that the comic was also featured in the weekly comic roundup on WoW.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
